Recent Settlements

The owner alleged recurring drivability and electrical problems with a 2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500, including check engine light concerns, intermittent no-start behavior, and stalling sensations. Service records reflect multiple visits to a Chevrolet dealership in the Los Angeles area for warning-light and electrical system troubleshooting. California protections apply statewide, including in Los Angeles.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

Repair History (from service records)

The visits below summarize what the records show (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, and result).

Pattern Summary

• Two documented service visits within a short span for warning-light/drivability and electrical power concerns (including “check engine light,” “no crank/no start,” and “felt like it wanted to turn off”).
• Electrical-system troubleshooting included module communication codes (e.g., U0140 / U0073) and battery system testing.
• Service actions included negative battery cable replacement and later ECM software reprogramming, reflecting an escalating electrical/controls approach.
• The second visit’s narrative reflects multiple concurrent symptoms (lighting flicker, display/lock issues) alongside drivability concerns—often consistent with a broader electrical or network issue.

Recalls & Common Complaints (2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500)

Recall campaigns are often VIN-specific. If you’re seeing similar symptoms, a quick VIN recall check can confirm whether your Chevrolet Silverado 1500 is included.

• Loss of Steering Assist (GM Safety Recall 17276): Records include a notice describing a potential intermittent loss of electric power steering assist and a remedy involving EPS module software (and related diagnostic guidance).
• Brake Vacuum Pump (GM Customer Satisfaction Program N172208640): Records include a notice describing an inspection process for the brake vacuum pump, with replacement if needed based on inspection results.

Why "check engine light on" allegations matter

When a truck repeatedly shows warning lights or intermittent power loss, the issue can be more than an inconvenience—it may affect safe drivability, reliability, and resale value. Electrical faults that create no-start or stall-like behavior can be especially disruptive because they may be intermittent and difficult to duplicate. A documented pattern of repeat visits and escalating repairs can help demonstrate that the concern may persist despite repair attempts, which is often central in California vehicle disputes.

Settlement Outcome

The case resolved through a confidential settlement under California law. Financial terms were not publicly disclosed.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

• See more Chevrolet cases

California Lemon Law Rights

Even when a vehicle is purchased used, California consumers may have options if the vehicle was covered by a manufacturer warranty during the relevant period and repeated defects substantially impact use, value, or safety. A repeat pattern of warning lights, no-start conditions, and electrical malfunctions—supported by dated repair orders—can be highly relevant in a California Lemon Law analysis. California Lemon Law help

• Repeat repair attempts: Multiple visits for the same core symptom can be important.
• Electrical/network evidence: Codes, battery findings, and module troubleshooting can support a systemic issue.
• Documentation: Verbatim “Customer States” narratives and repair actions help establish the timeline.
• Responsibility: Warranty obligations and dealer-sale conduct can point to different legal theories.

California Lemon Law – Common Questions

How many repair visits are “enough” in California?

There is no single magic number. Repeated attempts for the same substantial defect—or a pattern showing the problem persists—can support a claim, especially when the defect affects use, value, or safety.

Does Los Angeles matter for a California Lemon Law claim?

No. California consumer protections apply statewide. Los Angeles is simply the location tied to the owner and/or service history in this case.

What if the issue is intermittent and the dealer writes “unable to duplicate”?

Intermittent electrical and drivability faults are common in real-world disputes. The paper trail still matters—your “Customer States” narrative, warning lights, codes, and repeat visits can show a consistent pattern even when a symptom is hard to reproduce on demand.

Can a recall or customer satisfaction program help my case?

Potentially. Recall and program notices can support that a problem type is recognized at the model/vehicle level, but eligibility and remedies can be VIN-specific. They do not automatically resolve whether your vehicle qualifies as a lemon, especially if problems continue.

What documents should I gather for a fast case review?

Bring your full set of repair orders/invoices (all pages), any warranty paperwork, and any purchase/finance documents (contract, add-ons, disclosures). A complete timeline is often the fastest way to identify the strongest theory under California law.

Next Steps

If your Silverado has repeat warning lights, electrical failures, or stall/no-start behavior, the safest move is to preserve your paper trail and get a California-focused review of your service history and purchase documents. In most cases, no win, no fee applies, and deadlines can apply under California law—so it’s worth acting promptly.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

The owner alleged repeated defect concerns with a 2012 Hyundai Azera, including engine grinding noise, oil leak complaints, and harsh shifting/drivability issues. Service records reflect multiple visits and documented attempts to diagnose and address the issues. California protections apply statewide, including for Orange County drivers.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

Repair History (from service records)

The visits below summarize what the records show (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, result).

Pattern Summary

• Documented concerns included engine grinding noise at cold start/start-up and oil leak complaints across multiple visits.
• “ENGINE SEIZED … while driving vehicle … turned off … unable to turn vehicle on.” (RO K79549)
• Records reflect major drivetrain-related work noted as “REPLACED TRANSMISSION” after an oil leak concern tied to the transmission area.
• Some visits show “NPF” / unable-to-verify outcomes despite continued noise complaints.
• The owner also reported harsh shifting and other drivability concerns that can affect use and reliability.
• Repair documentation and repeated presentations can help establish whether a defect substantially affects use, value, or safety.

Recalls & Common Complaints (2012 Hyundai Azera)

Recall campaigns are often VIN-specific. If you’re seeing similar symptoms, a quick VIN recall check can confirm whether your Hyundai Azera is included.

• ABS module fluid leak / electrical short — engine-compartment fire risk (NHTSA campaign 23V-651): NHTSA documentation describes brake fluid leaking into the ABS module, potentially causing an electrical short and increasing the risk of an engine-compartment fire; Hyundai’s remedy communications describe replacing the ABS module fuse (or fuse kit) as part of the repair performed by dealers at no charge.
• Occupant Classification System (OCS) misclassification — passenger airbag deactivation may not work as intended (NHTSA campaign 13V-264 / “CAMP111”): Hyundai identified that the SRS Occupant Classification System may not properly classify a right-front passenger, may illuminate the airbag warning lamp, and may impact when deactivation of the front passenger airbag is appropriate; dealers repair the airbag system at no charge.

Why "engine is grinding" allegations matter

When a vehicle repeatedly presents with “engine grinding” complaints, that symptom may point to a serious underlying mechanical or lubrication-related issue. Even when a shop cannot reproduce the condition every time, recurring grinding noise and related oil leak concerns can affect drivability, reliability, and resale value. Under California law, a documented pattern of unresolved or returning defects can support a Lemon Law claim when the problem substantially impacts use, value, or safety.

Settlement Outcome

Resolved through a California Lemon Law repurchase: without admitting liability or wrongdoing, the manufacturer repurchased the vehicle and paid the owner $51,979.96 as a monetary settlement. Without admitting liability or wrongdoing, the matter was resolved under California law with the vehicle returned and compensation paid to conclude the dispute.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

• See more Hyundai cases

California Lemon Law Rights

California’s Lemon Law can protect owners when a warranted vehicle has substantial defects that persist after reasonable repair attempts. When problems like grinding noises, oil leaks, or harsh shifting keep returning—or the vehicle spends excessive time in the shop—owners may have the right to pursue remedies such as repurchase, replacement, or compensation (depending on the facts). California Lemon Law help

• Repeat repair attempts for the same defect or symptom pattern.
• Major component repairs (engine, transmission, drivability systems) that indicate a substantial issue.
• Documentation—repair orders and invoices can establish timelines, mileage, and recurrence.
• Statewide coverage—California protections apply regardless of where in the state the owner lives or services the vehicle.

California Lemon Law – Common Questions

How many repair attempts are “enough” in California?

There is no single magic number. Repeated attempts to fix the same symptom (or a closely related symptom pattern), major component work, or excessive time out of service can support a claim when the problem substantially affects use, value, or safety.

What if the dealership says it can’t reproduce the issue (“NPF,” “could not verify,” or “no problem found”)?

“Unable to verify” notes do not automatically end the analysis. If the records show the same complaint returning over multiple visits—especially with consistent language like “engine grinding at cold start,” oil leaks, harsh shifting, or drivability concerns—that documentation can still help establish a recurring defect pattern.

Do “engine grinding,” oil leaks, and harsh shifting/drivability issues potentially qualify as substantial defects?

They can, depending on severity and recurrence. Grinding/noise allegations can indicate a potentially serious mechanical condition; oil leaks can affect reliability and value; and harsh shifting/drivability issues can materially impact safe operation and everyday use—particularly when the problem persists after documented attempts to diagnose or repair.

Does a major drivetrain repair (like a transmission replacement) matter for a Lemon Law claim?

It can. Major component work can be a strong indicator that the concern was treated as significant, and it can also help show that the vehicle required substantial repairs yet the same or related symptoms continued or returned.

Does my city matter (Orange County / Orange, CA)?

No. California Lemon Law protections apply statewide. Orange/Orange County is relevant for local context and where service visits occurred, but your rights do not depend on living in a particular California city.

Next Steps:

1. Collect your paperwork. Gather every repair order/invoice and any warranty or service-history printouts. Keep the dates and mileages intact.
2. Write a short timeline. List each visit by date, mileage, and the key symptom language (e.g., “engine grinding at cold start,” “oil leak,” “harsh shifting/drivability”).
3. Document recurrence and impact. Note whether the issue returned after each visit and how it affected drivability, reliability, or safety (for example: hesitation, harsh shifts, warning indicators, or ongoing leaks/noises).
4. Do not wait—deadlines can apply. Delay can make records harder to obtain and may affect available remedies under California law.
5. Get a case review focused on the repair pattern. Call (888) 536-6628 or start your FREE Case Review at /free-vehicle-history-review so we can review your repair history and explain potential next steps under California law.
6. Avoid signing anything without review. If a dealer or manufacturer presents any release, buyback paperwork, or “goodwill” agreement, have it reviewed first so you understand how it could affect your options.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

The owner alleged recurring drivability and engine-related problems in a 2016 Mazda CX-9 serviced in Bakersfield, California, including shut-off while merging, overheating/coolant-loss concerns, and later fuel-smell / loss-of-power complaints. The service records reflect a "goodwill" repair along with a serious pattern that may affect use, value, and safety. California Lemon Law protections apply statewide.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

Repair History (from service records)

Pattern Summary

• Service history reflects a major engine/cooling concern with reported overheating and coolant loss, followed by an engine replacement.
• The records also reflect a serious drivability/safety allegation: the vehicle shut off while merging onto the freeway.
• A later visit documents loss of power/jerking and fuel-smell/fuel-cap-area concern, even where the shop notes state it could not duplicate the issue at that time.
• A multi-visit pattern like this can be material under California Lemon Law when it affects use, value, or safety.
• Goodwill assistance is often voluntary support (not necessarily an admission), but it may indicate the concern was treated as significant.

Recalls & Common Complaints (2016 Mazda CX-9)

Recall campaigns are often VIN-specific. If you’re seeing similar symptoms, a quick VIN recall check can confirm whether your Mazda CX-9 is included.

• Coolant leak / overheating context: Public NHTSA bulletin materials describe Mazda guidance for certain CX-9 model years regarding coolant leaks at the cylinder head area (a complaint pattern that can present as overheating/coolant loss).
• Fuel / EVAP warning context: Public NHTSA bulletin materials also discuss scenarios tied to EVAP leak codes (e.g., P0456) and fuel cap closure—relevant where records describe fuel-cap-area odor/concerns.

Why "CUSTOMER STATES THAT CAR IS SHUT OFF WHEN MERGING ONTO FREEWAY" allegations matter

A shut-off while merging can be a high-risk drivability event because it may leave a driver without power at the exact moment acceleration is required for safety. Even if a shop later notes it “could not duplicate” a symptom, the underlying issue can still be intermittent and materially affect use, value, and safety. In a California Lemon Law case, a documented pattern of serious drivability complaints and major component repairs may be significant.

Settlement Outcome

The case resolved through a monetary settlement of $52,462.09 under California law. Without admitting liability, the defendants denied wrongdoing and paid to resolve the dispute.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

California Lemon Law & Auto Fraud Rights

Based on the service-record pattern, this matter most directly fits a California Lemon Law / warranty theory.

• Substantial defects: Problems that affect use, value, or safety—including stalling/shut-off events and overheating/cooling failures—can qualify when they persist after reasonable repair opportunities.
• Goodwill: The service records also note ‘goodwill approval to replace engine,’ which is often voluntary assistance (not necessarily an admission), but it can underscore that the concern was treated as significant.
• Reasonable repair opportunities: Repeated visits for the same defect—or major repairs that do not end the problem—can support a claim depending on timing and recurrence.
• Warranty obligations: Warranty coverage and repair documentation matter; repair orders often establish the timeline and the nature of the defect pattern.

California Lemon Law – Common Questions

How many repair attempts are “enough” in California?

There is no single number. Repeated attempts for the same defect—or major repairs that do not end the problem—can support a claim.

Does a major repair like an engine replacement matter?

Yes. Major component repairs can help show the defect was substantial and materially impacted the vehicle.

What does a “goodwill” engine replacement mean?

In many service records, “goodwill” refers to voluntary assistance the manufacturer or dealer authorizes to help cover a major repair (sometimes outside standard warranty expectations). It is not necessarily an admission of wrongdoing, but it can indicate the concern was treated as significant. Accepting a goodwill repair does not automatically waive California Lemon Law rights; eligibility depends on the defect pattern and repair history.

Does my city matter (Bakersfield)?

No—California Lemon Law protections are statewide. Bakersfield is simply where the records reflect service activity.

What should I gather for a case review?

Repair orders/invoices (all pages), any warranty/extended-warranty paperwork, and any settlement or release documents if the case already resolved.

Next Steps

If you’re dealing with recurring defects, major repairs, or safety-related drivability problems, do not wait—deadlines can apply under California law. In most cases, no win, no fee applies. Start with a document review so you can understand whether your vehicle’s repair pattern qualifies.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

The owner alleged ongoing no crank / no start problems in a 1991 Acura NSX, including at least one tow-in for a sudden no-crank condition. Service records show repeated starting failures and later work that included battery terminal service and a starter assembly replacement. This type of repeat drivability issue can impact use, value, and reliability under California warranty and used-car Lemon Law protections.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

Repair History

Pattern Summary

• Multiple records reference starting failure / “no crank” concerns, including a tow-in no-crank event and later intermittent recurrence.
• Service records show another no-crank event after the vehicle previously cranked/started normally.
• The repair history includes battery terminal service and a starter assembly replacement, consistent with troubleshooting an intermittent starting/starting-circuit issue.
• Warning indicators were documented, including traction control and SRS-related concerns.
• Service notes include observations that may bear on vehicle condition (including a frame/subframe-related recommendation).
• Even without a check-engine light, intermittent no-start problems can create major reliability and safety-risk situations (unexpected breakdowns, stranding, tow events).
• Repairs and recommendations included starter/starting-system work, electrical/terminal correction, and related inspections.

Why "no crank / no start" allegations matter

A “no crank/no start” condition can be a serious reliability and safety issue because it can leave a driver stranded without warning and often points to electrical, starter, or interlock faults that may recur. When the concern is intermittent, it can be harder to diagnose and may require multiple visits before the root cause is confirmed. In a used-vehicle dispute, documented starting failures and related warning indicators can also be material because they may affect the vehicle’s use, value, and the consumer’s understanding of what they were buying.

Settlement Outcome

The case resolved through a vehicle surrender/repurchase-style outcome: Wells Fargo Auto agreed to take possession of the vehicle and pay the owner $29,000 to resolve the dispute under California law. The resolution also addressed post-sale account treatment and related credit-reporting terms tied to the vehicle financing.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

California Lemon Law Rights

California’s Lemon Law and related consumer-protection statutes can apply when a vehicle has repeat defects that substantially affect use, value, or safety, and repair attempts do not resolve the problem within a reasonable number of opportunities.

Depending on the facts, records like these can support a claim by showing a documented pattern of failure and attempted fixes. Remedies can vary by vehicle status (new vs. used), warranty coverage, and repair history.

• Repeat repair attempts can matter: recurring no-start events can qualify as a substantial drivability defect.
• Documentation is leverage: repair orders establish date-stamped proof of the problem pattern.
• Used vehicles can still qualify: many used-car cases turn on whether a warranty applies and whether defects persist after repair opportunities.
• Statewide protections: the legal standards apply throughout California, regardless of city.
• California Lemon Law help
• See more Acura cases

California Lemon Law – Common Questions

How many repair visits are “enough” in California?

There is no single number. Repeated attempts for the same substantial defect—or a pattern showing the issue persists—can support a claim, especially when records document the concern and the attempted fixes.

What if the vehicle is used or older?

Used vehicles can still raise California consumer-protection and warranty issues, depending on what warranties applied (if any), what was represented at sale, and what the documentation and repair history show.

What counts as a “substantial defect”?

Issues that affect drivability, reliability, or safety—like recurring no-start events—may be substantial because they can prevent normal operation without warning.

Does North Hills matter for my case?

No. California protections apply statewide. North Hills is relevant for context, but the consumer-rights standards do not change city to city.

Can a finance company be involved in a used-car dispute?

Yes. When a retail installment contract is assigned, the facts can support claims that involve the assignee/finance entity—particularly in disputes about obligations, documentation, and remedies tied to the contract and vehicle condition.

Next Steps

If you’re seeing recurring warning lights, intermittent no-start events, or major repair recommendations shortly after purchase, the fastest path is to gather your repair orders, invoices, and any sale/finance paperwork and have them reviewed together. Deadlines can apply under California law, so it’s best not to wait.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

The owner alleged repeated defect and repair issues with a 2016 Cadillac SRX serviced in Inglewood, California. Records reflect multiple visits over time for concerns documented in service paperwork. California Lemon Law protections apply statewide.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

RO Index

Repair History (from service records)

The visits below summarize what the records show (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, result).

Pattern Summary

• Multiple documented service visits over time at the same dealership/service department.
• Brake rumble/noise was reported early in ownership (use/drivability concern).
• Later records reflect an engine-noise complaint described as a “flutter” from the engine area.
• Fuel-range behavior was documented as changing “constantly,” suggesting an ongoing drivability/accuracy concern.
• Several visits appear to be inspection/maintenance entries but still help establish the visit timeline.

Why "fuel range changes constantly" allegations matter

When a vehicle’s reported range or fuel-readout behavior changes unpredictably, it can affect day-to-day reliability and drivability. Issues like this may also signal underlying sensor, fuel-system, or control-module problems that can recur even after inspection. In California, documented repeat visits for the same concern can become important when assessing whether a defect materially affects use, value, or safety.

Settlement Outcome

Resolved through a California Lemon Law repurchase. Without admitting liability or wrongdoing, the matter concluded with $50,023.83 in total settlement consideration as part of the repurchase resolution under California law.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

California Lemon Law & Auto Fraud Rights

California’s Lemon Law can apply when a warranty defect substantially affects a vehicle’s use, value, or safety and the defect persists after reasonable repair opportunities. Key points that commonly matter in cases like this include:

• Repeat repair attempts: Multiple visits for the same (or closely related) concern can support a Lemon Law theory.
• Warranty coverage: Manufacturer warranty obligations and dealership repair documentation are often central to proving the pattern.
• Paper trail strength: Repair orders, service-history entries, and dated mileage records can corroborate repeat problems.

For background, see California Lemon Law help and Cadillac Lemon Law cases.

California Lemon Law – Common Questions

How many repair visits are “enough” in California?

There is no single magic number. Repeated attempts for the same defect—or a defect that keeps returning—can be significant, especially when it affects drivability or safety.

Does it matter if some visits look like inspections or maintenance?

Even “inspection” entries can help establish the overall service timeline and show how often the vehicle was brought in around the period the concern persisted.

What defects typically qualify as “substantial”?

Defects tied to drivability, safety, or meaningful reliability problems are often treated as substantial—especially when they recur or resist repair.

Does Inglewood matter?

No. California Lemon Law protections are statewide; Inglewood is simply the location tied to the service history and/or ownership records.

Next Steps

If your vehicle has repeat warranty issues, you do not need to wait for a dangerous failure before exploring options. Deadlines can apply under California law, and early document review helps preserve the strongest timeline. In most cases, there are no attorney’s fees unless there is a recovery.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

The owner alleged repeated defect and repair issues with a 2017 Nissan Frontier serviced in Atascadero. Service records reflect recurring overheating concerns and escalating engine-related recommendations. Protections apply statewide in California.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

Repair History (from service records)

The visits below summarize what the records show (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, result).

Pattern Summary

• Multiple documented service interactions over time, including a prior overheating-related visit that resulted in a cooling-system component replacement.
• Later visits escalated to engine-level allegations, including head gasket failure language and an engine replacement recommendation.
• The alleged condition is the type of problem that can affect use, value, and safety—especially when overheating repeats or worsens.
• The history includes both routine maintenance entries and defect-related visits, supporting a timeline of ownership and service activity.
• The alleged concern appears to have progressed rather than resolved, based on later diagnostic wording and recommendations.

Recalls & Common Complaints (2017 Nissan Frontier)

Recall campaigns are often VIN-specific. If you’re seeing similar symptoms, a quick VIN recall check can confirm whether your Nissan Frontier is included.

• MIL / fuel-trim-related fault codes (TSB): NHTSA-published Nissan service guidance addresses some 2016–2017 Nissan Frontier vehicles with the check engine light (MIL) on and DTC P2097 and/or P2099 stored (post-catalyst fuel trim), including diagnostic direction and ECM reprogramming-related procedures.
• MIL / ECM backup-circuit code (TSB): NHTSA-published Nissan service guidance covers some 2015–2019 Nissan Frontier vehicles with the check engine light (MIL) on and DTC P0603 stored (ECM backup circuit), with diagnostic guidance aimed at addressing repeat warning-light concerns.

Why "engine overheating" allegations matter

Overheating can be more than an inconvenience—it may signal a condition that affects drivability, reliability, and long-term engine integrity. When overheating repeats or escalates into head gasket or engine-level concerns, it can materially impact safety and resale value. A documented pattern of visits and recommendations can also help show the issue was not isolated.

Settlement Outcome

Without admitting liability, the case ended in a California Lemon Law repurchase (buyback) with a total payment of $69,780 to resolve the dispute under California law.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

California Lemon Law Rights

If a vehicle develops substantial defects covered by warranty and the problems persist after reasonable repair attempts, California’s Lemon Law may provide strong remedies. Depending on the facts, potential relief can include a buyback/repurchase, reimbursement of certain losses, and coverage of attorney’s fees under the statute. California Lemon Law help

• See more Nissan cases

California Lemon Law – Common Questions

How many repair attempts are “enough” in California?

There is no single magic number. Repeated attempts for the same substantial issue—or a problem serious enough to affect use, value, or safety—can qualify depending on timing and documentation.

Does it matter that repairs happened in Atascadero?

No. California Lemon Law protections apply statewide. Atascadero is simply the location tied to the service history reflected here.

What kinds of problems tend to qualify?

Issues that substantially impact use, value, or safety—especially repeat failures, major component concerns (engine/transmission), and conditions that worsen over time—are common qualifying patterns when supported by repair documentation.

What should I gather before contacting a California Lemon Law lawyer?

Repair orders/invoices, a service history printout, warranty paperwork (if available), and any settlement or buyback paperwork. If financing was involved, the retail installment sales contract can also matter.

Next Steps

If you’re dealing with repeated defects, safety concerns, or warranty runaround, the fastest next step is to have your repair history reviewed for a qualifying pattern under California law. In most cases, there are no attorney’s fees out-of-pocket if there is no recovery, and deadlines can apply.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

The owner alleged recurring SYNC infotainment failures in a 2014 Ford Flex, including screen blackouts, intermittent backup-camera failures, and “911 Assist needs service” alerts, after multiple dealership visits in the Murrieta/Temecula area. California Lemon Law protections apply statewide.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

RO Index (All Detected Repair Orders)

Repair History

The visits below summarize what the service records reflect (date, mileage, concern, and the documented service response).

Pattern Summary

• Multiple service visits documented for SYNC/infotainment malfunction behavior and touchscreen issues.
• Screen failures were described as intermittent (turning off/on, stuck on home screen, not responsive).
• Backup camera concerns were also documented as intermittent during testing.
• Service actions included hotline-guided troubleshooting and reset procedures rather than a permanent fix.
• The repeated pattern suggests a technology-related defect affecting use and reliability.

Why "Sync will randomly malfunction" allegations matter

Infotainment and touchscreen failures can be more than frustrating—they may affect daily drivability and features tied to safety, such as camera systems and alerts. When a defect is intermittent, repeated repair visits can help document the real-world pattern. Under California law, recurring problems that impact use, value, or safety may support Lemon Law relief.

Settlement Outcome

Resolved through a California Lemon Law repurchase: without admitting liability or wrongdoing, the manufacturer repurchased the vehicle and paid the owner $53,000 as a monetary settlement under California law.

California Lemon Law & Auto Fraud Rights

California’s Lemon Law protections can apply when a vehicle has repeated warranty defects that substantially impact use, value, or safety—even when the issue is intermittent or difficult to duplicate on demand. Technology problems like SYNC failures and backup camera malfunctions may qualify when they persist after reasonable repair opportunities.

• Repurchase (buyback) or replacement in qualifying cases
• Reimbursement of certain related losses in appropriate situations
• Attorney’s fees and costs in many successful Lemon Law claims
• Statewide protections across California

Learn more: California Lemon Law help and Ford Lemon Law claims.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

California Lemon Law – Common Questions

How many repair visits are “enough” in California?

There’s no single number. Repeated attempts for the same defect—or a persistent defect that remains unresolved—can support Lemon Law relief.

Do SYNC screen failures and infotainment glitches qualify under Lemon Law?

They can. If the malfunction affects normal use, reliability, safety-related features, or resale value—and keeps returning after repair attempts—California Lemon Law may apply.

What if the dealership says the problem is “intermittent” or can’t be duplicated?

Intermittent issues are common in technology defects. The key is documenting repeat visits, consistent symptoms, and continued failure despite troubleshooting or resets.

Does Murrieta matter for a California Lemon Law claim?

No—protections are statewide. Murrieta is simply where the owner is located, but California Lemon Law applies across the entire state.

Next Steps

If your SYNC screen, camera system, or vehicle technology keeps failing—and repairs haven’t solved it—don’t wait. Deadlines can apply under California law, and early documentation strengthens your claim.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

The owner alleged recurring air-conditioning failures in a 2015 Ford Mustang, including intermittent warm air and driver-side cooling concerns, despite multiple dealership service visits. When the same comfort and drivability issue keeps returning, it can affect daily use, resale value, and confidence in the vehicle. California’s Lemon Law protections apply statewide, including for Downey drivers who serviced their vehicle at a dealership in the region.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

Repair History (from service records)

The visits below summarize what the service records show (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, and result).

Pattern Summary

• Multiple documented service visits tied to A/C cooling performance, including intermittent warm air complaints.
• Repeat concerns involving driver-side cooling issues versus passenger-side performance.
• Escalation from inspection and recharge attempts to dye testing for leaks.
• A later visit identified an A/C compressor leak, followed by compressor replacement and recharge.
• Additional A/C diagnosis occurred again after prior component replacement, suggesting ongoing system concerns.

Why "A/C blows warm air" allegations matter

Intermittent A/C failures can be more than an inconvenience—temperature control affects daily usability and can signal a persistent mechanical or refrigerant-system defect. When the same symptom returns across multiple visits, it may indicate the vehicle wasn’t repaired to conform to warranty expectations. A documented pattern can also support a claim that the issue impacts the vehicle’s use and value for a California consumer.

Settlement Outcome

The case ended in a California Lemon Law repurchase (buyback), with stated total settlement consideration of $60,500.

California Lemon Law & Auto Fraud Rights

California’s Lemon Law may apply when a warranted vehicle has defects that substantially impact use, value, or safety, and the manufacturer is given a reasonable opportunity to repair the problem.

• Repeat repair attempts: Multiple visits for the same concern can help establish a repair pattern.
• Warranty coverage: Manufacturer warranty obligations generally include properly diagnosing and fixing covered defects.
• Buyback and reimbursement remedies: Eligible cases may result in repurchase or replacement under California law.
• Attorney’s fees: In many successful Lemon Law matters, manufacturer-paid attorney’s fees may be available.

Learn more about your options here: California Lemon Law help.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

California Lemon Law – Common Questions

Can air-conditioning problems qualify under California Lemon Law?

Yes. When the A/C problem is substantial and persists after reasonable repair attempts, it may support a claim based on reduced use and value.

How many repair attempts are “enough”?

There is no single magic number. Repeated visits for the same symptom (or a defect that keeps returning) can be important evidence.

Does it matter that I’m in Downey?

No. California Lemon Law protections apply statewide. Downey simply reflects where the owner was located while the issue was being addressed.

What documents help the most in a Lemon Law case?

Repair orders showing dates, mileage, the customer’s complaint, and what the dealership did are often the most important starting point.

Next Steps

If your Mustang’s A/C problems keep coming back—or the dealership can’t consistently fix the issue—don’t wait. Deadlines can apply under California law, and a documented service history can make a major difference.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

The owner alleged repeated check engine/EPC light and misfire concerns in a 2012 Audi Q5, with service records documenting multiple visits and escalating repairs. If you are dealing with a similar pattern in California, you may have rights under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (California Lemon Law).

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

Repair History (from service records)

The visits below summarize what the records show (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, result).

Pattern Summary

• Multiple visits tied to engine misfire symptoms and warning lights (check engine and EPC).
• Injector-related repairs appear repeatedly across different service dates and mileages.
• The repair trajectory escalated from component-level work to major engine work (including a cylinder head replacement).
• A return-after-repair pattern is reflected by the reappearance of warning lights after prior service.

Recalls & Common Complaints (2012 Audi Q5)

Recall campaigns are often VIN-specific. If you’re seeing similar symptoms, a quick VIN recall check can confirm whether your Audi Q5 is included.

• Fuel pump flange cracking / fuel leak risk: Certain 2009–2012 Audi Q5 vehicles were recalled because fuel pump flange components may crack and leak fuel, which can raise fire risk.
• Driver frontal airbag inflator rupture risk: Certain 2009–2012 Audi Q5 vehicles were recalled because a driver frontal airbag inflator may rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious injury.
• MIL + misfire / poor performance diagnostic pattern (TSB context): Audi issued guidance for 2.0T engines where MIL-on conditions may coincide with misfires and poor performance, including certain fuel-pressure-related fault codes.

Why "check engine light / EPC light" allegations matter

Warning lights tied to misfires can signal drivability problems that may affect the vehicle’s use, value, and safety. A repeat-return pattern after attempted fixes can also suggest the issue was not fully resolved. In California, documented repair history is often central to evaluating whether a consumer’s warranty protections may apply.

Settlement Outcome

Resolved through a California vehicle repurchase with a monetary settlement totaling $42,991.41. Without admitting liability or wrongdoing, the defendants agreed to repurchase the vehicle and pay the owner $42,991.41 to resolve the dispute under California law.

California Lemon Law & Auto Fraud Rights

California’s Lemon Law can apply when a warrantied vehicle develops substantial defects that persist after reasonable repair opportunities, or when the vehicle spends substantial time out of service for repairs. These protections apply statewide, regardless of where in California the repairs occurred.

• Repurchase or replacement remedies when a substantial warranty defect cannot be repaired within a reasonable number of attempts.
• Coverage for safety, drivability, and value-impairing issues (not limited to one specific part).
• Strong value of documentation—repair orders and invoices often determine how a pattern is evaluated.
• Statewide rights—West Hollywood is simply the local context; the governing protections are California-wide.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

California Lemon Law – Common Questions

How many repair attempts are “enough” in California?

There is no single fixed number. Repeated attempts for the same problem—or a pattern that shows the defect persists—can be important in evaluating a Lemon Law claim.

Do misfires and recurring warning lights qualify as Lemon Law issues?

They can, depending on severity, repeat frequency, and whether the problem substantially affects use, value, or safety—and whether it persists after reasonable repair opportunities.

Does West Hollywood matter for my legal rights?

No. California Lemon Law protections apply statewide. West Hollywood is simply the local reference point for this example.

What should I gather before contacting a Lemon Law attorney?

Repair orders/invoices, warranty paperwork (if available), and any settlement or repurchase paperwork. A clear timeline of visits and outcomes is often the most helpful starting point.

Next Steps

If your Audi Q5 has repeated warning lights, misfires, or returns to the shop after attempted fixes, consider getting your documents reviewed promptly. In most cases, there are no fees unless there is a recovery, and deadlines can apply under California law.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

The owner alleged sales/finance misconduct tied to a pre-owned 2014 Nissan Rogue Select purchase and financing, alongside ongoing drivability concerns reflected in service records (including CVT-related complaints and major transmission service). Protections apply statewide in California, and Torrance is simply where the owner is located.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

The table below summarizes what the service records reflect (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, and result).

Pattern Summary:

• Multiple visits documented drivability complaints, including hesitation/jolting and shaking during braking/stop events.
• CVT overheating indicators and high CVT count references were documented in connection with drivability concerns.
• The service history reflects a major transmission event (CVT assembly replacement) during ownership.
• Follow-up service after the transmission work still reflected drivability concerns and required additional diagnostic steps.
• Later service documentation also reflected noise/vibration concerns and component securing work.

Why “CVT fail-safe / reduced performance” allegations matter

When a vehicle enters a CVT protection strategy (sometimes described as “fail-safe” or reduced performance), drivers may experience hesitation, delayed acceleration, or reduced power—especially under load or after braking. In a California consumer case, that kind of drivability allegation can be material because it can affect safety, drivability, and resale value, and it can drive both warranty and transaction-based claims depending on the facts.

Settlement Outcome

The case resolved through a cash-and-keep style monetary settlement totaling $14,933.10 under California law. Without admitting liability or wrongdoing, the defendants paid to resolve the dispute. Cash-and-keep settlements generally mean the owner keeps the vehicle while receiving money to end the claims, rather than a repurchase or replacement.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies

California Lemon Law & Auto Fraud Rights

California law can provide overlapping protections when a vehicle dispute involves both (1) sales/finance problems at the point of purchase and (2) documented defects or warranty-type repair patterns during ownership. Depending on the facts, relief may include rescission-type remedies, restitution/damages, and warranty-based remedies.

• Auto sales/finance fraud and unfair practices: Disclosures must be accurate and material terms should not be misrepresented or hidden at signing.
• Contract alignment: Final contract terms should match what was represented before the buyer committed.
• Used-car warranty protections: Service records documenting repeated or substantial defects can support warranty or implied-warranty theories under California law when applicable.
• Lender/assignee involvement: In some transactions, financing entities can be implicated based on the structure of the contract assignment and the underlying conduct.

California Lemon Law – Common Questions

Is this “dealer fraud” or just a bad deal?

Dealer fraud issues typically involve misstatements, missing disclosures, or terms that do not match what the buyer was led to believe at signing. The key is what was represented, what was documented, and whether the paperwork aligns.

Can a lender be involved in a California auto fraud case?

Sometimes. When financing is part of the same retail installment transaction, certain claims may involve the lender/assignee depending on the documents and how the transaction was structured.

Can repeated CVT/transmission problems support warranty-based relief in California?

They can, particularly when service records show repeated drivability issues, significant component repairs, or major transmission work. Whether a specific vehicle qualifies depends on warranty status, timing, and the documented pattern.

Does Torrance matter for my legal rights?

No. California protections are statewide. Torrance is simply where the owner is located; the same core consumer-protection and warranty principles apply across California.

Next Steps

If you suspect your purchase paperwork, financing, or disclosures didn’t match what you were told—or your vehicle keeps returning for the same drivability defects—take action while records are fresh. Deadlines can apply under California law.

Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies