get a free case evaluation | Fast, Easy, & Stress-Free
Fast, Easy, & Stress-Free
Recent Settlements
The owner alleged harsh shifting and intermittent transmission “kick” sensations during gear changes in a 2016 Cadillac Escalade ESV serviced in Beverly Hills. Service records reflect multiple visits where software/module updates were performed to address shift-quality concerns. California Lemon Law protections apply statewide.
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
Repair History (from service records)
The visits below summarize what the records show (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, result).
| Date | Mileage | Dealership/Shop | Complaint | Diagnosis | Repair Performed | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-07 | 4,494 | Casa de Cadillac | Transmission “kick” on upshifts/downshifts; additional service concerns noted | Shift-feel concern addressed via calibration updates | Sequential ECM/TCM programming updates; road test; additional maintenance performed | Road test noted as OK after update |
| 2018-10-19 | 10,516 | Casa de Cadillac | Transmission kicks at slow speeds/stopping; HUD direction issue | Shift-feel concern tied to software level | TCM reprogramming/update; related module programming for HUD issue | Checked OK after programming |
| 2018-12-31 | 12,009 | Marvin K. Brown Auto Center | Odor from vents | Cabin air filter noted as dirty | Replaced cabin air filter; deodorizing/cleaning performed | Service performed |
| 2019-02-18 | 12,688 | Casa de Cadillac | Harsh engagement/kick from reverse to drive | Shift-feel concern addressed via software level | TCM reprogramming/update; test drive | Checked OK after programming |
Pattern Summary
- Multiple service visits documented shift-quality complaints (kicks/harsh engagement) at relatively low mileage.
- The primary documented “fix” was repeated transmission/engine control software programming updates.
- An HVAC odor concern recurred across visits and was later addressed with cabin filter replacement and related service.
- When shift concerns persist despite repeated updates, that pattern can support a California Lemon Law theory focused on use/value (and, depending on facts, safety/drivability).
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
Recalls & Common Complaints (2016 Cadillac Escalade ESV)
Recall campaigns are often VIN-specific. If you’re seeing similar symptoms, a quick VIN recall check can confirm whether your Cadillac Escalade ESV is included.
- Some manufacturer service guidance for 8-speed transmission shift-feel concerns focuses on updated procedures, calibration steps, and adaptive learn/reset processes for harsh/abnormal shifting under certain conditions.
- Some manufacturer service guidance for certain Escalade model years addresses “shudder”/vibration-type concerns under specific driving conditions and outlines diagnostic/repair approaches depending on configuration.
Settlement Outcome
Resolved through a California Lemon Law buyback: without admitting liability or wrongdoing, the manufacturer repurchased the vehicle and paid a total of $72,005.50 to resolve the dispute under California law.
California Lemon Law & Auto Fraud Rights
Under California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (California Lemon Law), a vehicle may qualify when a warranty-covered defect substantially impacts use, value, or safety and persists after a reasonable number of repair attempts (or the vehicle experiences substantial time out of service). California protections apply statewide.
- Repurchase (buyback) or replacement may be available when supported by the record and the legal standards.
- Reimbursement of certain incidental costs may apply when evidence supports it.
- Civil penalties can apply in willful-violation scenarios, depending on facts and proof.
California Lemon Law – Common Questions
How many repair attempts are “enough” in California?
There’s no single magic number. Repeated attempts for the same defect—or a defect that continues after the kinds of repairs the manufacturer recommends—can be enough depending on severity and impact.
Do software updates count as “repair attempts”?
They can. If the vehicle repeatedly returns for the same symptom and the dealership repeatedly performs programming updates (or related calibration steps) without a lasting fix, that history can be relevant.
Does Beverly Hills matter for a California Lemon Law claim?
No. California Lemon Law protections are statewide. Beverly Hills is simply where the service visits reflected in these records occurred.
What documents are most helpful for evaluating a potential buyback?
Repair orders/invoices (all pages), warranty/lease or purchase paperwork (if available), and a brief timeline of how the problem shows up in real driving.
Next Steps
- Collect every repair order page (including story/notes pages) and confirm dates/mileage lines are complete.
- Write a short symptom log (when it happens, how often, and how it affects drivability).
- Request a document review to confirm whether the pattern meets California’s Lemon Law standards and what remedy track fits best.
The owner alleged repeated water-heater failures and related electrical/interior problems with a 2018 Thor A.C.E. 32.1 motorhome serviced in Southern California RV near Upland. Based on the service pattern and warranty history, the dispute was pursued under California Lemon Law protections.
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
Repair History Table
The table below summarizes key entries from the service records (dates, mileage, complaints, and what was done).
| Date | Mileage | Dealership | Complaint | Diagnosis | Repair Performed | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-13 | 2,397 | Giant Inland Empire RV Center (Giant RV) | Generator inoperative; water heater inoperative; solar/furnace/electrical complaints; multiple interior/door/step concerns | Electrical/wiring and connection issues noted | Repaired wiring/connection issues; addressed multiple items; some items pending parts/authorization | Mixed—some repairs completed; other concerns continued/pending |
| 2018-08-01 | 2,492 | Giant Inland Empire RV Center (Giant RV) | Routine service | — | Oil and filter service | Completed |
| 2018-09-27 | 3,572 | Giant Inland Empire RV Center (Giant RV) | Water heater inoperative; interior door issues during transit | Water heater control/electrical issue suspected | Replaced/serviced water-heater control components; addressed interior door concerns | Reported tested/returned to service |
| 2018-10-15 | 3,625 | Giant Inland Empire RV Center (Giant RV) | Water heater would not light on gas and would not operate on 110V | Ignition-loss/control-board issue suspected | Diagnostic performed; control-board replacement indicated | Continued water-heater complaints documented after this visit |
| 2018-12-26 | 3,770 | Giant Inland Empire RV Center (Giant RV) | Water heater inoperative/intermittent; leak/pressure-type complaints; step/park-cable/drawer/trim issues | Connection/leak-related issues noted | Repaired/sealed/adjusted multiple items | Ongoing pattern documented |
| 2019-01-05 | 3,771 | Giant Inland Empire RV Center (Giant RV) | Water heater problems persisted; additional hardware items (antenna/lock pin) | Service parts/kit replacement performed | Serviced/replaced water-heater components and related parts; addressed hardware items | Returned to service; repeated water-heater theme remained central |
Pattern Summary
- Repeat water-heater failures across multiple visits (inoperative operation, ignition-loss-type complaints, and leak/pressure-related concerns).
- Electrical and power-system complaints documented early (generator/solar/shore-power/step/battery-related issues).
- Fit-and-finish and hardware problems (doors/drawers/trim/screen/window items opening or failing in transit).
- Water intrusion/leak allegations documented in connection with water-heater-area complaints.
Recalls & Common Complaints (2018 Thor A.C.E. 32.1)
Recall campaigns are often VIN-specific. If you’re seeing similar symptoms, a quick VIN recall check can confirm whether your Thor A.C.E. 32.1 is included.
- Some Thor Motor Coach motorhomes from this era had recall activity involving LP/propane system components (fire risk).
- Some Thor Motor Coach motorhomes from this era had recall activity involving exterior/trailer lighting wiring, which could affect lighting visibility.
Settlement Outcome
Without admitting liability or wrongdoing, the case resolved through a California Lemon Law repurchase, with the manufacturer buying back the motorhome and paying the owner $140,590.98 as a single total payment to end the dispute under California law.
The settlement stated it was not an admission of liability.
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
California Lemon Law & Auto Fraud Rights
California’s Lemon Law can apply when a warranted vehicle has substantial defects that persist after reasonable repair opportunities, or when the overall warranty-repair history shows an ongoing inability to conform the vehicle to warranty.
For motorhomes, coverage can still be meaningful even when different components have different warranty responsibility (for example, coach systems versus chassis-related systems). The service timeline and repair orders are typically the backbone of proving the pattern.
- Repeat repair attempts for the same system (e.g., water heater) can support a claim.
- Safety/drivability and water-leak issues can be material because they affect use, value, and safety.
- Documentation matters: dates, mileage, and repair narratives establish the pattern.
- Statewide protection: California Lemon Law is statewide; Upland primarily localizes where the consumer is based and where service activity occurred.
California Lemon Law – Common Questions
How many repair attempts are “enough” in California?
There is no single magic number. Repeated attempts for the same substantial defect—or a pattern showing the problem persists—can qualify.
Does California Lemon Law cover motorhomes and RVs?
Yes. Motorhomes can qualify, but responsibility can vary by component (coach systems vs. chassis systems). Your repair orders help clarify which defects were addressed and whether the pattern persisted.
Does my city matter (Upland)?
No. Protections are statewide in California; Upland primarily helps localize where the consumer is based and where service activity occurred.
What should I gather for a free case review?
Bring your purchase/finance paperwork (if available) and all repair orders/invoices showing dates, mileage, complaints, and what was done. A clean timeline is often the fastest way to evaluate eligibility.
Next Steps
If your RV keeps going back for the same system failures—especially water intrusion, electrical problems, or warranty runaround—do not wait. Deadlines can apply under California law, and early documentation review can materially improve outcomes.
2018 Beta 500RR-S Engine Stalling - Corona, CA
The owner alleged recurring engine bogging and stalling on a new 2018 Beta 500RR-S, including idle instability and stalls during riding conditions described in service notes. The pattern led to multiple service visits and a California Lemon Law repurchase outcome. California protections apply statewide, including for consumers in Corona.
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
Repair History (from service records)
The visits below summarize what the records show (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, result).
| Date | Mileage | Dealership/Shop | Complaint | Diagnosis | Repair Performed | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-04 | — | Mountain Motorsports (Ontario, CA) | Engine bogs down and dies; won’t hold idle; described as occurring during bumps/off-road conditions | Not duplicated | Inspection / check and advise | Tech noted unable to duplicate; owner asked to capture video if it continued |
| 2019-03-25 | 213 | Mountain Motorsports (Ontario, CA) | Stalling in first gear; idle “all over the place” | Loose battery connections noted | Service bulletin SB-2016-6; addressed battery connections | Repair performed under warranty |
| 2019-04-08 | 246 | Mountain Motorsports (Ontario, CA) | Stalling after ~30 minutes; sometimes during downshifting/neutral | Issue duplicated on this visit | Stepper motor test; charging/battery checks; ECU flash; cleaned ground connection to frame | Shop reported no stall after steps; owner advised to test and report if it returned |
Pattern Summary
- Recurrent stalling/bogging concerns described as drivability-impacting and intermittent.
- Early visit documented an inability to duplicate the issue, followed by repeat visits for the same core symptom set.
- Warranty service steps included a service bulletin, electrical/battery connection findings, and later ECU/ground-related work.
- The overall pattern supported a warranty dispute that proceeded as a California Lemon Law repurchase matter.
Recalls & Common Complaints
Recall campaigns are often VIN-specific. If you’re seeing similar symptoms, a quick VIN recall check can confirm whether your Beta 500RR-S is included.
No verified model-year-specific recall/complaint patterns were included.
Settlement Outcome
Without admitting liability or wrongdoing, the defendants completed a California Lemon Law repurchase (buyback) and paid the owner $22,000.00 as a monetary settlement under California law.
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
California Lemon Law & Auto Fraud Rights
California’s Lemon Law protections can apply when a new vehicle (including many new motorcycles sold or leased in California) has a substantial warranty-related problem that persists after reasonable repair attempts, or when the vehicle spends excessive time out of service.
. Typical remedies may include repurchase/buyback or other relief depending on the facts and documentation.
- Repeat repair pattern: Multiple documented visits for the same drivability concern can support a Lemon Law claim.
- Intermittent issues still count: “Hard to duplicate” problems can still qualify when the pattern is documented over time.
- Documentation: Repair orders and timelines are key evidence of the pattern.
- Remedies can include repurchase: A buyback is one common resolution pathway when the defect remains unresolved under warranty.
Learn more: California Lemon Law help
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
California Lemon Law – Common Questions
How many repair attempts are “enough” in California?
There’s no single number that fits every case. Repeated attempts for the same substantial defect—or significant time out of service—can be enough, especially when the problem affects use, value, or safety.
What if the dealership says they “can’t duplicate” the problem?
Intermittent issues are common. What matters is the paper trail: consistent complaints, repeated visits, and what the shop documented (including “no problem found,” service bulletins, or electrical/ECU work).
Can a Lemon Law case also involve dealer or sales issues?
Sometimes. If the deal paperwork, disclosures, or financing terms don’t match what you were told, those facts can raise separate California consumer-protection issues. A document review is the quickest way to sort the theories.
Does my city (Corona) matter?
No. California protections are statewide; Corona is simply relevant for local context and where the owner is located.
Next Steps
If your motorcycle keeps stalling, bogging down, or cycling through warranty “fixes” that don’t stick, you may have options under California Lemon Law. We can review your repair history and settlement-related facts and tell you—plainly—whether it looks like a case worth pursuing in California.
2017 Honda Pilot Touring Warning Lights & Loss of Power - Lancaster, CA
The owner alleged recurring warning lights and reduced-power drivability problems in a 2017 Honda Pilot Touring serviced in Lancaster, California. California protections apply statewide.
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
Repair History (from service records)
The visits below summarize what the records show (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, result). The documentation reflects repeated warning-light and reduced-power concerns within a short timeframe, with diagnostics escalating to a module replacement.
| Date | Mileage | Dealership/Shop | Complaint | Diagnosis | Repair Performed | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-19 | ~16,348 | Honda Lancaster | Check engine light; intermittent reduced performance | DTCs documented (including throttle-position related codes) | Diagnostics performed; codes cleared | Vehicle released back to owner |
| 2019-03-25 | ~16,368 | Honda Lancaster | All warning lights on; “no power” concern | DTCs documented; inspection performed | Connector/inspection steps; codes cleared; test drive | Vehicle released after testing |
| 2019-04-02 | ~16,427 | Honda Lancaster | All warning lights on; “no power” concern | Testing indicated a failed input/circuit condition | PCM/ECU replaced; road test performed | Warning lights did not return during the visit |
Pattern Summary
- Repeat concern: Multiple visits close together for warning lights and reduced-power drivability issues.
- Material drivability impact: “Reduced power” / “no power” complaints can affect safe use and reliability.
- Escalating repair action: Records show a progression from diagnostics to module replacement.
- Documentation: Date-stamped repair orders help establish the pattern and timing.
Recalls & Common Complaints (2017 Honda Pilot)
Recall campaigns are often VIN-specific. If you’re seeing similar symptoms, a quick VIN recall check can confirm whether your Honda Pilot is included.
- Fuel pump recall (model-year range includes 2017): Certain Honda Pilot vehicles were included in a safety recall involving a fuel pump impeller defect that can lead to engine stall while driving.
- Airbag inflator recall (model-year specific): Some 2017 Honda vehicles (including Pilot) had recall activity involving passenger frontal airbag inflator replacement.
- PGM-FI software update bulletin: Service bulletins describe PGM-FI/idle-stop software updates for certain Pilot trims/model years that can relate to drivability/engine-management behavior.
Settlement Outcome
Without admitting liability or wrongdoing, the case ended in a California Lemon Law repurchase, with the manufacturer buying back the vehicle and paying the owner $25,138.
California Lemon Law Rights
If your vehicle keeps going back for the same issue, loses power or becomes unreliable, or still isn’t right after multiple repair attempts, California Lemon Law protections may apply statewide—including in Lancaster.
- Possible remedies: repurchase (buyback) or replacement in qualifying cases.
- Reimbursement: certain out-of-pocket costs may be recoverable, depending on the facts.
- Attorneys’ fees: may be available where permitted by California law.
Learn more: California Lemon Law help | Honda Lemon Law cases
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
California Lemon Law – Common Questions
How many repair attempts are “enough” in California?
There’s no single magic number. Repeated attempts for the same defect—or a serious safety or drivability issue that persists—can support a claim.
Does Lancaster, CA matter for Lemon Law coverage?
California Lemon Law is statewide. Lancaster is simply where this repair history was documented.
What documents help most in a Lemon Law case?
Repair orders showing dates, mileage, complaints, dealer findings, and what was done (or not fixed) are typically the most important.
What if my vehicle was financed?
Financing does not prevent a Lemon Law claim. Repurchase settlements often address lien payoff and related logistics as part of the resolution.
Free Case Review
If you’re dealing with repeated warning lights, reduced power, or a vehicle that keeps returning to the shop, we can review your repair history and explain next steps under California law.
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
Attorney advertising. Not legal advice. Results depend on facts and law, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
The owner alleged recurring refueling problems and EVAP/check-engine-light concerns in a 2018 Ram 1500 serviced in Huntington Beach. Service records reflect multiple visits addressing fuel-filling difficulty (nozzle sticking/clicking off) and related fuel-system components. Protections apply statewide in California.
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
Repair History (from service records)
The visits below summarize what the records show (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, result). Mileage progressed from ~5,883 to ~12,703, with repeat work targeting EVAP/fuel-filling components and later a fuel tank/ESIM replacement.
| Date | Mileage | Dealership/Shop | Complaint | Diagnosis | Repair Performed | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/21/2018 | 5,883 | Huntington Beach Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram | Vehicle shut off / no-start concern | Battery terminal/ground noted loose | Reinstalled/secured battery terminals | Returned to customer |
| 12/05/2018 | 6,256 | Huntington Beach Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram | Check engine light | EVAP small leak (P0456) | Replaced fuel tank pressure sensor; tested purge valve; EVAP test | Test passed; MIL addressed |
| 12/21/2018 | 6,494 | Huntington Beach Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram | Problems fueling; nozzle sticks | Filler neck abnormality | Replaced fuel filler neck | Repair performed |
| 07/08/2019 | 12,162 | Huntington Beach Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram | Still hard to fill; nozzle sticks | “Hard to refill gas” concern | Replaced fuel filler tube; campaign/recall work noted in records | Retest noted as good |
| 07/30/2019 | 12,703 | Huntington Beach Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram | Repeat hard-to-fill/nozzle stuck | Fuel filler neck kink / tank angle concern; ESIM noted | Replaced fuel tank and ESIM; further verification recommended | Released for customer to confirm at next fill-up |
Pattern Summary
- Repeat refueling defect. The same “hard to fill / nozzle stuck” symptom appears across multiple visits.
- Escalating repairs. Work progressed from EVAP diagnostics to filler neck/tube repairs and a fuel tank + ESIM replacement.
- Check-engine-light overlap. Records reflect EVAP small-leak diagnostic activity during the service history.
- Documentation supports the timeline. Date-stamped repair orders help establish what was attempted and when.
Recalls & Common Complaints (2018 Ram 1500)
Recall campaigns are often VIN-specific. If you’re seeing similar symptoms, a quick VIN recall check can confirm whether your Ram 1500 is included.
- Some Ram 1500 vehicles have documented service-bulletin guidance for hard/difficult filling conditions (nozzle shutting off early, fuel spit/spill) on certain configurations.
- Service records in this case also reference a tailgate-related campaign item performed during a 2019 visit; recall applicability is VIN-specific.
Settlement Outcome
Based on the settlement records, the matter resolved through a vehicle repurchase-style settlement under California law with a total settlement amount of $45,944.40.
In general, a “repurchase/buyback” outcome means the manufacturer takes the vehicle back (title/possession transfer) as part of resolving the dispute, rather than the owner simply keeping the vehicle with a cash payment.
California Lemon Law Rights
When a vehicle shows a repeated defect pattern—and the records reflect multiple repair attempts—California’s Lemon Law may provide remedies that can include repurchase or replacement, plus recovery of attorney’s fees and costs in qualifying cases.
Learn more: California Lemon Law help
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
California Lemon Law – Common Questions
How many repair attempts are “enough” in California?
There’s no single number. Repeated attempts for the same defect—or substantial impact on use, value, or safety—can qualify depending on the facts and documentation.
Does Huntington Beach matter for California Lemon Law?
No. Protections are statewide; Huntington Beach is simply where these services occurred.
What if the problem is “hard to fill” and the gas nozzle keeps clicking off?
That can be more than an inconvenience—especially when it persists after repairs. Service documentation showing repeat visits for the same symptom can be important evidence.
What does a “vehicle repurchase” settlement generally mean?
In general, it means the manufacturer takes the vehicle back as part of resolving the dispute. The details depend on the written settlement terms and case facts.
Get Help
Deadlines can apply under California law. If you’re dealing with repeat repairs, warranty runaround, or a defect that won’t stay fixed, it may be worth having the documentation reviewed.
The owner alleged persistent electrical and electronics problems in a 2015 Hyundai Sonata, including no-start/battery-drain concerns and an instrument cluster display issue, with repeated dealership visits in 2019. Protections apply statewide in California.
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
Repair History (from service records)
The visits below summarize what the records show (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, result).
| Date | Mileage | Dealership/Shop | Complaint | Diagnosis | Repair Performed | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-05 | 31,077 | Stevens Creek Hyundai (Santa Clara, CA) | Routine service + update requests | — | Oil/filter service; Apple CarPlay update; Campaign 953 performed | Visit completed |
| 2019-04-17 | 31,374 | Stevens Creek Hyundai (Santa Clara, CA) | Center digital info not visible after ECU/cluster update | No DTCs noted | Installed cluster assembly; calibrated/variant coding | Operating as designed |
| 2019-05-13 | 32,047 | Stevens Creek Hyundai (Santa Clara, CA) | Battery dead after sitting; parasitic draw confirmed; other electronics concerns | Techline involvement noted | Replaced smart junction box; replaced audio unit | No draw noted after repair |
| 2019-05-28 | 32,256 | Stevens Creek Hyundai (Santa Clara, CA) | Battery dead again after sitting ~24 hours | Aftermarket alarm system identified | Removed aftermarket alarm; monitored | No draw detected; starting restored |
| 2019-06-03 | 32,383 | Stevens Creek Hyundai (Santa Clara, CA) | No-start after sitting | Battery failing to hold charge | Replaced battery; noted infotainment items missing after audio unit install | Battery replaced; follow-up documented |
| 2019-06-04 | 32,383 | Stevens Creek Hyundai (Santa Clara, CA) | Passenger seat belt warning / belt recognition concern | — | Replaced passenger buckle | Operating as designed |
Pattern Summary
- Repeated no-start/battery-drain complaints over multiple visits in ~2 months.
- Escalation to cluster replacement and electrical/infotainment component replacements.
- Parasitic draw troubleshooting included removal of an aftermarket alarm system.
- Seat-belt warning/buckle recognition symptom was documented and repaired.
Recalls & Common Complaints (2015 Hyundai Sonata — context)
Recall campaigns are often VIN-specific. If you’re seeing similar symptoms, a quick VIN recall check can confirm whether your Hyundai Sonata is included.
- Some 2015 Sonata vehicles had a front passenger seat belt buckle recall involving a condition that could prevent proper buckling.
- Some 2015 Sonata vehicles were included in a parking brake switch recall where corrosion could cause the warning light to intermittently not illuminate.
- Hyundai issued Service Campaign 953 (“Sonata ECM & Cluster Update – Engine Monitoring Logic Product Improvement”) for certain Sonata vehicles.
Settlement Outcome (high-level)
The case resolved through a $17,000 monetary settlement under California law, with allocations described in the settlement record. The settlement states the payment and negotiations are not an admission of liability or wrongdoing.
California Lemon Law Rights
When a vehicle has repeated warranty repair visits for the same or closely related problems—especially issues that affect use, value, or safety—California’s Lemon Law can provide leverage to seek relief such as a repurchase, replacement, or cash compensation in qualifying cases.
Helpful records include repair orders, dates/mileage, and notes showing what was (and wasn’t) fixed. See: California Lemon Law help and Hyundai warranty cases.
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
California Lemon Law – Common Questions
Can battery drain and no-start problems qualify under California Lemon Law?
They can, particularly when the issue substantially affects reliability/use and the records show repeated warranty visits without a durable fix.
How many repair attempts are “enough”?
There is no single number for every case. A recurring issue with multiple documented attempts (or a safety-related issue that persists) can support a claim, depending on severity and repair history.
What documents matter most for an electrical/infotainment dispute?
Repair orders (with complaints and outcomes), battery tests/replacements, parasitic draw testing notes, module replacements, and any manufacturer/techline involvement.
Does Mountain View matter if the dealership is in another city?
California Lemon Law is statewide. Your city helps with local focus and convenience, but the legal protections apply across California when the warranty issues and repair history are in-state.
Get Help
If you’re seeing repeated no-start events, battery drain, or electronics failures that keep coming back, don’t wait—deadlines can apply under California law.
The owner alleged repeated defect and repair issues on a 2018 Honda Accord, including battery/no-start concerns and brake/ABS/VSA warning problems documented in dealership service records. California Lemon Law protections apply statewide.
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
The owner alleged repeated defect and repair issues with a 2018 Honda Accord serviced in Chino Hills. Records show early-life battery/no-start symptoms and brake/ABS/VSA warning issues addressed through dealership repairs. Protections apply statewide in California.
Repair History (from service records)
The visits below summarize what the records show (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, result).
2018 Honda Accord — Documented Service Visits
Date
Mileage
Dealership/Shop
Complaint
Diagnosis
Repair Performed
Result
2018-11-17 to 2018-11-20
4,969–4,975
Sierra Honda (Monrovia)
Jump-start needed multiple times; intermittent parking sensor warning; intermittent brake warning; Apple CarPlay concern
Battery tested bad; warning lights attributed to failed VSA/ABS modulator (per RO notes)
Battery replaced; rear camera safety update (18-092) performed; ABS/VSA modulator replaced; brake fluid flush/retest; Apple CarPlay concern not duplicated
Vehicle returned (per mileage-out); some concerns documented as intermittent/NPF
2019-02-09
9,390–9,391
Sierra Honda (Monrovia)
Routine service/inspection
Inspection completed
Oil/filter service and multi-point inspection items
Vehicle returned
Why This Pattern Matters Under California Law
- Repeat or major component repairs. Substantial defects that persist after reasonable repair attempts can qualify under California Lemon Law.
- Safety & drivability. Brake/ABS/VSA warning indicators can impact use, value, and safety.
- Documentation. Clear, date-stamped repair orders establish the timeline.
California Lemon Law – Common Questions
How many repairs are “enough” in California?
There’s no single number; repeated attempts for the same defect—or substantial time out of service—can qualify.
Does my city matter?
No. Protections are statewide; Chino Hills is simply where these services were documented.
If you’re facing repeated defects, safety concerns, or warranty runaround with Honda, call (888) 536-6628 or start your FREE Case Review and we’ll review your repair history and documents.
Recalls & Evidence-Gated Notes
- Confirmed in these records: rear camera safety recall update (18-092) performed during the November 2018 visit.
- This section is otherwise limited to what the documents confirm (no external recall/complaint databases used for additional claims).
Settlement Outcome
The matter resolved through a California settlement that required surrender of the vehicle and payoff handling through the manufacturer’s finance channel, along with other settlement consideration.
Confidentiality note: the settlement includes a confidentiality provision that explicitly restricts the owner and counsel from disclosing financial terms, so the outcome is summarized at a high level.
California Lemon Law Rights & Next Steps
If a vehicle has substantial warranty defects that persist after reasonable repair opportunities—or spends substantial time out of service—California’s Lemon Law may provide remedies (often including repurchase or replacement). While this case is documented primarily through warranty repair history, certain paperwork or disclosure issues in other matters can also raise dealer-fraud concerns under California law.
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
California Lemon Law – Common Questions
Do brake/ABS warning lights count as a safety defect?
They can, because braking/ABS systems directly relate to safety and drivability; eligibility depends on the documented pattern and warranty context.
Can recall work affect a Lemon Law case?
Recall repairs can overlap with warranty service history; what matters is whether substantial defects persisted and how the warranty repair timeline developed.
When does a case become “dealer fraud” instead of Lemon Law?
If documents show undisclosed add-ons, spot-delivery/yo-yo terms, payoff misstatements, or contract terms that don’t match what was represented, those issues may support additional California claims beyond Lemon Law.
Talk to a California Lemon Law & Auto Fraud Firm
If your vehicle has repeat defects, safety warnings, or ongoing warranty repair visits, deadlines can apply under California law. No win, no fee in most cases.
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
Attorney advertising. Not legal advice. Results depend on facts and law, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
The owner alleged recurring drivability and major component issues with a 2017 GMC Yukon XL serviced in California, including check-engine events tied to transmission concerns and later engine-related repairs, along with documented A/C system repairs. California protections apply statewide.
Repair History (from service records)
The visits below summarize what the records show (dates, mileage, complaint, diagnosis/repair, result). Mileage progressed from ~67,051 to ~91,298 with repairs including rear A/C evaporator, A/C condenser, transmission assembly, engine lifters, and a right-front hub and engine mount.
| Date | Mileage | Dealership/Shop | Complaint | Diagnosis | Repair Performed | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/21/2022 | 67,051 | California GM dealer | A/C blows warm | Rear evaporator leaking | Replaced rear evaporator kit; recharge | Verified repair |
| 03/29/2022 | 68,610 | California GM dealer | A/C not cold | Condenser leaking | Replaced condenser; recharge | Verified repair |
| 05/05/2022 | 71,222 | California GM dealer | Check engine; shakes when cold | P257D, P2101; throttle body dirty; hood switch issue | Customer declined recommended repairs | Advised |
| 11/15/2022 | 79,338 | California GM dealer | Check engine / harsh shifts | P0700/P0796; metal debris in fluid | Replaced transmission assembly; programmed; cleared codes | Verified after repair |
| 09/26/2023 | 88,385 | California GM dealer | CEL on; rough running | P0300/P0301; cylinder 1 lifter not locking; no compression | Replaced lifters & gaskets; reassembly | Road-tested |
| 12/05/2023 | 91,298 | California GM dealer | Loud noise while driving | Right-front hub play; left engine mount broken | Replaced right-front hub assembly; replaced engine mount | Noise gone / verified |
Pattern Summary
- A/C repair history: documented repeat A/C-related work across separate visits.
- Powertrain escalation: check-engine/drivability concerns included transmission replacement and later engine-related repairs.
- Multiple visits over time: ongoing service history rather than a single isolated repair event.
- Material components involved: transmission and engine-related work can be significant under California Lemon Law analysis.
Why This Pattern Matters Under California Law
- Repeat or major component repairs. Transmission assembly replacement, major engine lifter work, and multiple A/C failures can meet Lemon Law thresholds when defects persist or require substantial shop time.
- Safety & drivability. Check-engine events, misfire/no compression, and wheel-hub play can raise safety concerns.
- Documentation. Clear, date-stamped repair orders help establish the pattern needed for California remedies.
Recalls & Common Complaints
Recall campaigns are often VIN-specific. If you’re seeing similar symptoms, a quick VIN recall check can confirm whether your GMC Yukon XL is included.
No verified model-year-specific recall/complaint patterns were included.
Settlement Outcome
No settlement agreement/release was included in the uploaded records, so settlement terms (if any) are not reflected here.
California Lemon Law Rights
If your vehicle has substantial defects that persist after reasonable repair attempts—or spends extended time in the shop—California’s Lemon Law and warranty protections may provide remedies. Documentation like repair orders is often central to proving the pattern.
- Repeated repairs for the same issue (or closely related symptoms)
- Major component repairs (engine/transmission)
- Ongoing drivability/safety impacts
- A repair history that supports a “reasonable number of attempts” argument
Free Case Review – See If Your Vehicle Qualifies
California Lemon Law – Common Questions
How many repairs are “enough” in California?
There’s no single magic number, but repeated attempts for the same defect—or substantial time out of service—can qualify under California law.
Do A/C, transmission, and engine issues count?
Yes. Major component failures and repeated A/C failures can qualify when they materially affect use, value, or safety.
Does my city matter?
No. Protections are statewide; the city listed is simply where service occurred.
If you’re facing repeated defects, safety concerns, or warranty runaround with GMC, call (888) 536-6628 or start your FREE Case Review and we’ll review your repair history and documents.
Our firm represented a West Covina buyer who purchased a 2022 Toyota Highlander from Envision Toyota of West Covina on 12/26/2021. The vehicle (VIN ending 4687) showed 19 miles at sale and was financed through Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. After signing via an electronic signature pad, the buyer later discovered a deferred down payment of $3,632 due 01/09/2022 and financed add-ons, along with significant negative equity from a trade-in that increased the total financed cost.
Free Case Review – Call us now at (888) 536-6628 or start your Free Vehicle Evaluation.
What Happened
The buyer reports being promised a combined $45,000 for two trade-ins. The contract lists $33,500 for a 2016 Lexus LS (with an approximately $49,384 prior balance), creating about $15,884 in negative equity rolled into the deal. A second trade-in entry shows no agreed value. The retail installment sale contract also shows one deferred down payment of $3,632 due 01/09/2022, followed by 84 monthly payments of $918.86 beginning 02/09/2022, with an Amount Financed of $62,224.14. Optional products included a Vehicle Service Contract (First Automotive Service Corp., 72 months/100,000 miles) and a Debt Cancellation Agreement ($1,050). The buyer describes an e-signature process where only a signature box was visible, limiting the ability to review documents on screen.
Key Legal Issues in This California Case
- Undisclosed deferred down payment: A separate “due later” down payment can be unlawful when not clearly disclosed and agreed before signing.
- Trade-in valuation & negative equity roll-in: Promises about trade value that are not reflected in the contract, or negative equity quietly rolled into the financing, can support California auto sales/finance fraud claims.
- Add-on products & payment-packing risk: When add-ons (e.g., GAP/debt cancellation, VSC) are bundled into the monthly payment without clear, informed consent, that may constitute unfair or deceptive practices.
- Contract terms not matching promises/worksheets: If the final contract fails to match pre-signature representations, California law provides remedies.
- Process concerns with e-signing: Signature capture workflows that prevent consumers from reviewing all pages can be probative of unfair practices.
What This Means for California Vehicle Owners
Even if your vehicle runs fine, California law protects buyers from sales and finance abuses: undisclosed deferred down payments, misrepresented trade-in values, or payment-packed add-ons can all be actionable. If your monthly payment is higher than expected, or promised figures did not make it into the final contract, you may have claims under California consumer laws.
- Have your purchase, finance, and trade-in documents reviewed—especially if a deferred down, negative equity, or add-ons are involved.
- Protections apply statewide; West Covina is simply where this transaction occurred.
California Resources
For background reading on California protections, see our information pages: Auto Dealer Fraud and Automotive Sales & Repair Fraud.
California Lemon Law & Auto Fraud – Common Questions
What is an “undisclosed deferred down payment” in California?
It’s a down payment split so a portion is due later—often weeks after delivery. If not clearly disclosed and agreed before signing, this structure can be unlawful and supportive of a fraud claim.
How do trade-in payoff and negative equity affect my rights?
Dealers must accurately reflect your trade-in value and any prior loan payoff. Quietly rolling negative equity into the new amount financed, or failing to honor promised trade values, may violate California law.
Are add-ons like GAP/debt cancellation or a service contract “payment packing”?
They can be. If add-ons are bundled into the monthly payment without clear, voluntary consent and pricing, that is a classic payment-packing red flag.
Does it matter that I signed electronically?
No—what matters is whether you had a meaningful chance to review and understand the contracts before signing. An e-signature process that hides terms can strengthen a consumer claim.
Does my city matter, or is this statewide?
Protections are statewide. Whether you’re in West Covina or anywhere in California, the same laws apply.
Get Help
If you’re seeing repeated no-start events, battery drain, or electronics failures that keep coming back, don’t wait—deadlines can apply under California law. Ready to have your documents reviewed? Call (888) 536-6628 or start your Free Vehicle Evaluation today. Most cases are handled with no fees unless there is a recovery.
Buyer purchased a used 2021 Hyundai Tucson with undisclosed water damage from STG Auto Group of Bellflower in California. After purchase, the buyer noticed a moldy smell coming from the seats and vents, and upon inspection, it was discovered that there were signs of water damage to the seat cushions and carpets, as well as rust under the dashboard.
After retaining the attorneys at LemonLawAutoFraud.com, STG Auto Group agreed to take back Hyundai, pay the buyer $3,710, and all attorney fees.
review my case